Prime Minister Philip J. Pierre has increasingly argued that changing laws alone cannot eliminate crime if the behaviours that ultimately produce violence are not addressed.
That places families, schools, communities and social institutions alongside the police and courts in Saint Lucia's crime response.
Police intervention generally occurs when a crime is being committed or after it has occurred. Courts determine responsibility and punishment. Prisons remove offenders from society and, ideally, provide rehabilitation. Prevention must begin earlier.
That means identifying children and young people displaying serious behavioural problems, strengthening parenting support, improving school-based interventions, providing counselling and mentorship and creating legitimate opportunities through education, sport, employment and entrepreneurship.
Government already invests across several of those areas. Expanded educational assistance, school feeding, youth entrepreneurship, community infrastructure and increased investment in sport all have objectives extending beyond their immediate benefits. Collectively, they can provide structure, opportunity and alternatives for young people.
But the existence of programmes does not automatically guarantee prevention.
The more difficult policy question is whether interventions are reaching the children, families and communities facing the greatest risk and whether agencies are identifying warning signs early enough.
There is also a responsibility that Government programmes cannot replace.
Parents influence behaviour. Communities determine what they tolerate. Schools help establish discipline and values. Adults model conflict resolution. Citizens decide whether to cooperate with authorities or remain silent when serious crimes occur.
Government therefore has a responsibility to provide effective laws, properly resourced police, functioning courts and credible social interventions.
Citizens have responsibilities too. If Saint Lucia's crime strategy is to become more effective, the national conversation may need to move beyond choosing between enforcement and prevention. The country requires both.
Tough laws can punish criminal behaviour. Effective policing can deter and detect it.
But the longer-term objective must be to prevent fewer young Saint Lucians from entering the criminal justice system in the first place.